political nonsensery
I really like the idea of America. Like, really like it. Like, broke down into tears at the Library of Congress like it. I like OG America though, not really new America. And though I call myself a Libertarian when pressed to choose a party, many people have argued I am not because several of my beliefs are completely out of line with Libertarian thought. Which is wildly true, but 1. there’s not any other party which is CLOSER to my political beliefs and 2. We live in a country that is democratic and a republic, and thus, as the country was set up, some non-libertarian things must stand (notably, public education).
So, if you are sick of my snarky frustrated comments that are equally anti-McCain and Obama this season, you might want to stop here. Otherwise, herein (woo–constitutional!) I will identify my strong political beliefs and we can all decide who I should vote for.
1. Immigration– I haven’t seen that big green lady with the sign up close, but I am pretty sure her whole deal is we accept anyone in any condition. I don’t believe in illegal immigrants. I think it’s hypocritical to have quotas. While I am all for a citizenship test, and say, a certain number of years residence, I would prefer someone who busts their ass to get here and make a living be a citizen over a person born here who couldn’t answer the questions on the test. I think it’s awesome that lots of people want to live in my country! I think the main reason people are anti-naturalization is benefits. So perhaps we should hinge that on other things? I dunno.
2. Health care–Holy Jeebus, socialized health care is the only way to go. At the very least for emergency health care, although I think study after study has shown that’s way more expensive than doing preventative health care as well. The whole idea of a government is to protect their citizenry from harm. That’s mainly taken to mean a standing army, but in this time period, I can’t imagine anything that prevents people from experiencing life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness like poor health care and bankrupting insurance. And if the government has a monetary interest in the health of people, then maybe lobbyists for
3. Drugs–In the short term, I am for the legalization of all drugs (all. all. yes, heroin. yes, all.) regulated in the same way cigarettes or booze is. States can determine more extreme laws to regulate that if they want, but clean, taxed, less stigmatized drugs equals a lot of money for most governments and less people dying of bad drugs/wacky dosages.
4. Abortion–I am a very rational person, generally. This is an area in which I am not rational. Abortion, legal all kinds, all times. No consent forms.
5. Taxes–I am no economist. This is generally out of my depth, as it is for most Americans. But I am very pro a waaaaaaaaaaay more simplified tax situation. No writeoffs, religions (and religiously derived non-profits) are taxed, including property. Companies are taxed. No, really, how they actually should be, no writeoffy lobbyists. Flat taxes for them! Woo! And no tax breaks for having children.
6. Education–All the Education money gets divided equally per student, with maybe some differences for cost of living. Definitely kids should be allowed to go to any public school, regardless of district. More magnet schools, including for disadvantages as well as advantages (i.e. magnet school for kids with XYZ learning disability). Way more stringent rules on home schooling. No funding for school sports. Again this is an area I could know a lot more about and I don’t have a complete solution. But I strongly believe as, say, Thomas Jefferson did, that a democracy rests on an educated electorate. I would also like it if religions could not have schools. But I think that’s not based in any reason. Just my personal dislike of religions.
7. Marriage–I don’t want gays to be able to legally marry, but I also don’t want heterosexuals to either. Marriage (as currently construed) has no place in a legal venue. It’s a religious bond. Yay. So civil unions for everyone, which include property/financial rights, next of kin, custody, etc. No tax breaks for getting married, either.
8. Transportation–Driving a car should be extremely more expensive in America. And carry way more responsibility. Drinking (or drugging) and driving should ban you from operating a car, first time, for years. Five, maybe? Also, in urban centers, cars would be banned from most places in Jennylandia. And by banned, I mean prohibitively expensive. Taxing vehicles in large urban centers would give us enough money to build a far more extensive public transit infrastructure, a la Europe. Driving tests would be way harder and driving instruction far more professional/required. I love that there’s all this talk about finding new driving technology so we are not so dependent on other countries’ oil, when this country used to have a public transit infrastructures in most cities that would have avoided the need for cars in most places.
9. Environment–More nuclear power plants, simply. Water, wind, wolar, that’s cool too. Some research on alternates to gasoline for the short term.
10. Guns–I like them. I feel very uncertain about how to legislate them. Essentially, if you force people to register their guns, you are defeating the purpose of having them in case of a rogue government. I know legal gun owners aren’t the problem. And I think legalizing concealed weapons is great.
11. Foreign Policy–I know the secret to “why they hate us”–it’s that we are in a freaking codependent relationship with Israel. We need to cut that out. I know it’s unpopular to say, but historically we have always backed terrorists who kill tons of innocent people. We just happen to like certain terrorists more than others. Let’s stop that. Also, can we start treating Putin like the crazy, crazy KGB agent he really is? And not be all buddy buddy with a dictator who kills all opposing forces in the media? That would be amazing. Also, could we stop bombing civilians anywhere? I agree that just leaving Iraq tomorrow would make that whole region way more unstable, but I don’t think forcing people who hate us to make a “democracy” that idolizes America will work out either. Do we really need another country where we will have military bases FOREVER? A hasty look at the pornography of Germany and Japan says that our intervention has seriously messed up those countries in a deep, deep (no pun intended) way.
12. Civil liberties/torture– Uh clearly PATRIOT is evil, and I wouldn’t vote for anyone who voted for it. The president and even federal government should not have as much power as it currently does. Also, all people “detained”/arrested should get the full rights of any American citizen–habeas corpus, miranda, charges and arrest before incarceration, lawyers present, no torture etc. Torture, while a moral issue, is more important here as an information issue. As these are my areas of expertise (information AND confession. it’s a useful intersection of expertise at this juncture), unlike, say, the economy, torture produces a lot of information. Information that is unreliable, and, unless you have some other way to corroborate it (and, if you did, why would you be torturing someone?), is useless. There are about 4 trillion studies that also show that people who torture will get crazy, and will not be able to keep it professional/aimed at actual answers. Has anyone who is pro-torture ever watched Lost? Seriously it doesn’t work. http://dir.salon.com/story/opinion/feature/2004/06/21/torture_algiers/index.html
13. Military–not my area of expertise either, but I think universal military service is a great idea.
14. Foreign Aid–Helping other people is good. And I’ll be all for helping other people in other countries when everyone in this country is adequately fed and clothed, well, and literate. Get back to me when that happens, Bono.
Alright these are the basics. So who should I vote for?


12 Comments so far
1. Miss E wrote on October 24th, 2008 at 6:38 am
Perhaps you should write yourself in on the ballot?
I was much less anti-McCain in the primary season than I am now, in part because he and his running mate have just ghastly women’s health records, and that’s one of the issues that matters most to me. I really think I’d be less opposed if he’d chosen a less bizarre running mate.
Otherwise, I’m right with you on most of these things. Over the summer I heard a program about population control (or population growth, or something like that), and how the tax credit for having kids has really hurt kids and our economy in the long run. This researcher had apparently argued for higher taxes on families with more kids based on the argument that the more kids you have, the bigger share of social services you’ll be using, and the more you should, by extension, pay in - this was back in the 70s, and he was roundly criticized for wanting to punish people for having kids - but his economist critics are now coming ’round to the idea that the system does kids a disservice anyway.
Sigh.
2. jenny wrote on October 24th, 2008 at 6:43 am
I actually liked McCain, except for his anti-abortion stance, like 5 yrs ago. But he’s completely changed his mind about most things I agreed with. Anyone who has been tortured and is now pro-torture? Bizarre.
I love that saying you don’t like Obama immediately means you love McCain. No, I like neither of them. Clearly I like Obama better than McCain, but I disagree with about 50% of his policies, at least.
3. Heidi wrote on October 24th, 2008 at 7:37 am
Thanks for laying it all out. I need to do this for myself as well. Some days the complexity of modern life is like my favorite thing ever, and other days it frustrates the crap out of me.
4. jennybento wrote on October 24th, 2008 at 7:46 am
Ha! Yeah I think if people did this more often, they’d be like “there’s no one who meets any of these criteria!”
5. Miss E wrote on October 24th, 2008 at 7:53 am
Right. They were also saying on the radio maybe on Friday that the McCain of the primary season is pretty different in terms of policies and positions than the current McCain - that he’s been pushed away from some of his more centrist views, which was the stuff that made him the most acceptable of the alarming batch of Republicans.
Though I won’t deny that the idea of the guy from Law & Order getting elected mildly appealed to me just out of hilarious awesomeness. Now, if only Sam Waterston ran for president…
6. jennybento wrote on October 24th, 2008 at 7:57 am
If Fred Thompson was elected, he’d have to have a sound man who would make the Law & Order noise whenever he came in the room.
7. Grace wrote on October 24th, 2008 at 8:58 am
Let me take your issues point-by-point:
1. Neither of them agree with you, Obama is closer.
2. Neither of them agree with you, Obama is closer.
3. Neither of them agree with you in any way.
4. Neither of them agree with you, Obama is MUCH closer.
5. Neither of them agree with you, Obama is closer.
6. Neither of them agree with you in any way.
7. Neither of them agree with you (but I do!).
8. Neither of them agree with you in any way.
9. The both say they agree with you, in reality I think Obama is closer.
10. McCain agrees with you. Palin really agrees with you.
11. Neither of them agree with you in any way.
12. Obama more or less agrees with you.
13. I don’t think either of them agrees with you, but McCain is probably closer.
14. Neither of them agree with you, McCain is probably closer.
So by my count, if we give “closer” agreements 1 pt and full agreements 2 pts, that’s 7 pts for Obama and 4 for McCain.
Now, third party, depends who is on your NY state ballot…
8. jennybento wrote on October 24th, 2008 at 9:16 am
“Closer” is bullshit. Voting for a major party is not really on the table. I am as close to McCain or Obama as they are to each other. They just don’t display that wide a margin of thought.
Also, Obama can say he is for civil liberties all he wants, but getting Joe Biden on the ticket is saying “I would like to shut down the internets and spy on everyone!” IMO.
9. Patricia wrote on October 26th, 2008 at 10:53 am
A caveat: this comment will not help you decide whom to vote for! So, you may want to stop reading now . . .
Although I know you’re not a fan of the New Yorker, have you seen this from David Sedaris: http://xrl.us/ouvbs
I’m impressed by your obnazhenie (of your views, that is) - I just don’t know anyone you could vote for, especially if “closer” doesn’t cut it for you.
As for me, I care a lot about whether a candidate is pro-choice or not, because the possible overturning of Roe v. Wade is often at the back of my mind. (By having Palin as his running mate, McCain has shown me where he stands on women’s issues - he doesn’t take them seriously.) I want a president who’s going to nominate someone to the Supreme Court who isn’t extremist like Scalia and Thomas, or strongly conservative like Alito and Roberts. (Another Justice Kennedy, I might be able to live with - BTW, he has more liberatarian views than the other conservative Justices.) This is no small consideration, since Justice John Paul Stevens is *88* years old. I’m confident that by voting for Obama (and with a Democratic majority in the House and Senate), the next Supreme Court nominee is likely to be someone I’d be behind.
But - as your post and these comments show - everyone votes for a candidate for different reasons.
I gotta ask, though: why no funding for school sports? I get the “no tax breaks” for married people or for those with children - but school sports shouldn’t get funded? Ob”iasni, pozhaluiista!
10. Grace wrote on November 3rd, 2008 at 1:57 pm
Closer is not bullshit. Closer is reality.
11. jennybento wrote on November 3rd, 2008 at 2:04 pm
Reality can be bullshit, you know.
No a minute level of closer is bullshit in my opinion especially for an office of someone who does not make laws.
12. jennybento wrote on November 3rd, 2008 at 2:10 pm
Hey Patricia, I just saw your comment. I didn’t read the Sedaris yet, but I shall do so!
Let me be clear, I would prefer Obama to McCain. If I were living in a battleground state, I might suck it up. It’s hard to say.
And I agree with you that pro-choiceness is one of my MAJOR issues. Especially with Supreme Court seats open. But the president doesn’t get to legislate abortion, so it’s not one issue I can vote on exclusively.
And while I believe in compromise, I more believe in this country’s foundation in a broad range of opinions. And until people start compromising less, voting for a wider range of people, and those parties getting the kind of funding and airtime that the major two get, it’s not really a race.
The major two parties like to paint themselves as extremely different and extremely at odds with each other, and it saddens me that people believe that.